As Lewisham Council confirms it has raised £10,000 towards the cost of next month’s Blackheath fireworks following Greenwich Council’s withdrawal, some of the sums involved have been confirmed.
Last year’s fireworks cost £104,000, Lewisham says. It and Greenwich stumped up £37,000 each, with outside sponsorship covering the remaining £30,000.
So, by withdrawing support from 2010’s event, Greenwich is looking to save in the region of £37,000. At the time, Greenwich said: “The council is committed to maintaining front line services and has a strong track record of identifying efficiency savings…”
But could Greenwich have found that money elsewhere, without dipping into front line services? Well, it’s confirmed that this May’s mayoral inauguration ceremony, held in the Painted Hall of the Old Royal Naval College, cost almost £29,500, with the sum being met in full from the council’s coffers.
The full sum, for those counting the pennies, was £29,472.75. The figures come from Freedom of Information Act requests sent to the two councils.
Obviously, this gives us a £7,500 shortfall, although we do know Greenwich has just shelled out on two costly PR campaigns for the 2012 Olympics. Lewisham tapped up local businesses – including the Clarendon Hotel – to get some of the extra money for this year’s. Let’s face it, if the will had been there, Greenwich Council could have found that money.
What happens at the mayoral inauguration? Well, as you’d guess from the name, it’s where the new mayor opens up their year’s duties. But it doesn’t have to be held in a lavish ceremony at an external venue – a mayor can simply be confirmed in office at a council meeting. But Greenwich uses its mayoral inauguration to wine and dine the great and the good – and for council leader Chris Roberts to deliver a big speech. Last year’s was so big, it even made the front of Greenwich Time…
Yup, providing the council leader with a chance to say that, for the front of his propaganda rag, cost Greenwich taxpayers nearly £30,000. Wonderful. All councillors are invited, but many don’t bother showing, either objecting to the cost or finding the whole thing a bore-fest.
So, funding a private party so the council leader can impress the great and the good, against contributing to a family event which delights 80,000 people each year?
Tough choices, indeed.
Lewisham has set itself a fundraising target of £35,000 to cover the shortfall left by Greenwich, but either way, it’s now underwriting November 6’s display so its council tax payers will be funding the cost of Greenwich’s withdrawal, whether in making up the money left over or by donating cash themselves. It’s now suggesting residents hold parties for Hallowe’en or make and sell pumpkin soup to raise the cash.
How sad that Lewisham’s residents are being asked to dress up to save Blackheath’s fireworks, all because Greenwich Council preferred to hold its own fancy-dress party instead.
To donate to Lewisham Council’s Blackheath fireworks appeal, visit www.lewisham.gov.uk/fireworks.
(WEDNESDAY UPDATE: Perhaps Greenwich could have found the cash from the £500,000 it blew on sacking 12 HR staffers, before recruiting 11 new ones… although it’s worth pointing out there is another side to that story.)
Well said, I’m disgusted by Greenwich’s actions over this and the mayoral party just about caps it off!
Champagne Marxists.
Why are we even surprised by any of this? As we are all being asked to ‘tighten our belts’, how many ‘politicians’ of any party and any level taking pay cuts themselves? Even without a freedom of information request I bet it’s not even 1.
Lead by example not by threat, Mr Roberts, Mr Cameron et al.
Ouch! Nice work.
This rag is a total waste of time/money/effort. I’d argue that 90% of the papers are pulped before they’re even read. In my block we have 8 flats, and everytime a new copy of that paper comes out I see 7 routinely dumped on the window sill for the clear to dump. I’m yet to figure out who’s reading it, I’d hazard a guess it’s the gent downstairs with a new kitten and he’s lining the litter tray with it.
[…] to freeze staff pay for four years and is halving its funding for voluntary bodies. Funding for Blackheath fireworks has been pulled – leaving Lewisham with a £36k shortfall which it’s now trying to fill […]
[…] following the Government’s Comprehensive Spending Review.” That didn’t stop it blowing nearly £30,000 on a private party for its new mayor earlier this year, of […]
[…] Alex Wilson didn’t ask why, despite the “current financial climate”, the council felt the need to spend £30,000 on its lavish private do for the mayor in May – which equates to a job. It also does seem odd that Peter Brooks is complaining about only […]
[…] course, nobody in the chamber bothered to ask him why it was appropriate for the council to splash out nearly £30,000 on a private party for the mayor and council leader in May. @smalltown2kChris O Also: @greenwichcouncl how was the […]
[…] we know Greenwich Council is happy to spend money on a mayoral booze-up instead of contributing its rightful sum to a fireworks party which attracts 100,000 people to the […]
[…] it’s very hard to make that point when you’re spending £30,000 on mayoral booze-ups and £15,000 on a bunch of comedians. Hopefully seeing their decisions pushed into centre stage […]
[…] fireworks claiming it was due to cutbacks, but we know this was nonsense – with the council having blown the cash on a mayoral booze-up and Olympics-linked arts projects. It’s easy – too easy, really – to criticise […]
[…] funding Blackheath fireworks (page 142) (Interestingly, there’s no plans to cut the expensive mayoral inauguration ceremony, despite it coming from the same pot of cash.) – cutting one of the four staff who work for the […]
greenwich council chief excutive?mary nye, 180.000 pa salary,does greenwich really need a chief executive,sack her and employ 8 staff @ 20.000 pa,& do we need chris roberts? who fails to attend council meetings?
[…] mentioned several times on this blog, Greenwich Council spends nearly £30,000 each year on a mayoral inauguration ceremony at the Old Royal Naval College. Most councils don’t bother with this, and have a short […]
[…] a comment » The next mayor of Greenwich, Jim Gillman, has asked council officials to cancel a £30,000 inauguration ceremony in his honour as the borough faces up to over £60m in government-enforced […]
[…] year’s event at the prestigious Greenwich venue cost £30,000 to stage, angering residents protesting against cuts to council services. Most other councils hold the […]
[…] including cuts to funding for youth, children’s and voluntary services, as well as the Blackheath fireworks and Maryon Wilson animal park in […]
[…] cutbacks and austerity. But if it’s now costing £10,000, why didn’t it cost £10,000 last year? There are still questions to be asked. It’s just a shame that Greenwich won’t engage […]
[…] £36,000 share of the funding for an event right on its border, preferring to put the cash towards a private mayoral booze-up and the “Greenwich Festivals” programme, while pleading poverty at the same […]
[…] Council stopped paying its share of the bill for Blackheath fireworks last year, so it could spend the money on a behind closed doors booze-up for the mayor […]
[…] north side of the A2. Inside Greenwich Council’s area – the same council that’s refused to co-fund the fireworks for the second year […]
[…] in his mid-70s – indicated he was opposed to having a ceremony in his honour last year, after this website revealed the £30,000 cost of 2010′s event. But he eventually backtracked and went along with 2011′s ceremony, which cost £12,362 after […]
[…] new readers: the full story of how Greenwich left Lewisham in the lurch in 2010 – and blew the cash on a booze-up for the mayor instead.) Share […]
[…] and thus the wider community. One of the roles of the Honorary Recorder would be to attend the inauguration of the Mayor and to be invited to other meetings and civic functions as appropriate, this could include civic […]
[…] isn’t good enough for Greenwich, which in the past has blown £30,000 holding an invite-only event, where favoured business execs, councillors and “community […]
[…] pleading poverty. The £37,000 cost was, according to deputy leader Peter Brooks, equivalent to one mayoral piss-up at the Naval College full-time […]
[…] Back in 2010, deputy leader Peter Brooks claimed Greenwich Council couldn’t afford it, a whopper so big it could be seen from space. […]
[…] controversy over the annual event rests on two points – 1) cost and 2) exclusivity. An FOI request in 2010 revealed an outrageous cost to the hard-pressed council taxpayer of nearly £30,000 – […]